The SCI Risk Sharing Awards cover the global capital relief trades market and the US credit risk transfer market. The aim of the awards is to recognise excellence in, and help bring mainstream attention to, the credit risk-sharing industry.
The Pelligon - London
AWARDS PROCESS
Award winners are decided through a two-step process, the first stage of which is a call for nominations. Based on these nominations, the SCI editorial team – in conjunction with an industry advisory board – will compile a shortlist for each category. The shortlist will then be published and the ultimate winners revealed during a gala black-tie dinner held at The Pelligon, Canary Wharf.
Final selections will be made by the SCI editorial team, based on submissions, colour from the market and our own independent research. Advisory board members will be required to sign confidentiality agreements and will be recused from judging an award that they are eligible to be nominated for.
During the call for nominations, market participants are invited to put themselves, their colleagues, clients and their peers forward to be shortlisted. To aid in the judging process, brief written pitches along with supporting data can be submitted by those wishing to be considered for a given category. All written pitches should be submitted by 31 May. Qualifying period: 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025.
Advisory Board
Aidan Mckeown
Alastair Pickett
Andrea Itri
Charis Edwards
Jean-Francois Leclerc
Wasif Kazi
AWARD CATEGORIES
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and highlight the ways in which the transaction stands out from its peers, including any data or testimonials to support your submission:
- What are the noteworthy/innovative features of the deal?
- Which strategic goals have been met through the execution of the deal?
- In which ways has the deal enabled your institution to adapt to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- How has the deal facilitated your engagement with the market?
To maintain consistency in terms of award winners, please note the following guidance:
- For deal-specific categories, nominations will be accepted only for commercial parties to the transaction (advisors are welcome to pitch, but only their investor/issuer client will be eligible for an award)
- For public/syndicated deals, only the issuer and arranger will be eligible for an award
- For private/bilateral deals, only the issuer, the investor and the arranger will be eligible for awards.
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and highlight the ways in which the transaction stands out from its peers, including any data or testimonials to support your submission:
- What are the noteworthy/innovative features of the deal?
- Which strategic goals have been met through the execution of the deal?
- In which ways has the deal enabled your institution to adapt to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- How has the deal facilitated your engagement with the market?
To maintain consistency in terms of award winners, please note the following guidance:
- For deal-specific categories, nominations will be accepted only for commercial parties to the transaction (advisors are welcome to pitch, but only their investor/issuer client will be eligible for an award)
- For public/syndicated deals, only the issuer and arranger will be eligible for an award
- For private/bilateral deals, only the issuer, the investor and the arranger will be eligible for awards.
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and highlight the ways in which the transaction stands out from its peers, including any data or testimonials to support your submission:
- What are the noteworthy/innovative features of the deal?
- In which ways does the deal satisfy ESG considerations?
- Which strategic goals have been met through the execution of the deal?
- In which ways has the deal enabled your institution to adapt to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- How has the deal facilitated your engagement with the market and/or the market’s engagement with ESG considerations?
To maintain consistency in terms of award winners, please note the following guidance:
- For deal-specific categories, nominations will be accepted only for commercial parties to the transaction (advisors are welcome to pitch, but only their investor/issuer client will be eligible for an award)
- For public/syndicated deals, only the issuer and arranger will be eligible for an award
- For private/bilateral deals, only the issuer, the investor and the arranger will be eligible for awards.
Overview
This category encompasses innovative deals/structures/documentation, as well as new products or platforms that further the development of the market.
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and highlight the ways in which the deal or product/platform being nominated differentiates itself, including any data or testimonials to support your submission:
- What are the noteworthy/innovative features of the deal or product/platform being nominated?
- How has it furthered the development of the market?
- Which strategic goals have been met through the deal or product/platform?
- In which ways has the deal or product/platform enabled your institution/end-users to adapt to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- How has the deal or product/platform facilitated engagement with the market?
To maintain consistency in terms of award winners, please note the following guidance:
- For deal-specific categories, nominations will be accepted only for commercial parties to the transaction (advisors are welcome to pitch, but only their investor/issuer client will be eligible for an award)
- For public/syndicated deals, only the issuer and arranger will be eligible for an award
- For private/bilateral deals, only the issuer, the investor and the arranger will be eligible for awards.
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your firm’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or client testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of specific deals, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your firm’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of specific deals, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your institution’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year, in terms of issuance volumes and landmark transactions?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of investor outreach, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your institution’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year, in terms of issuance volumes and landmark transactions?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of investor outreach, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your institution’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year, in terms of issuance volumes, third-party mandates and landmark transactions?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of client outreach, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your institution’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year, in terms of issuance volumes, third-party mandates and landmark transactions?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of client outreach, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your firm’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year, in terms of volume of deals advised on, as well as winning new clients and landmark transactions?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your firm adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of specific deals, client outreach, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How has your firm helped to further the development of the market?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your firm’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year, in terms of volume of deals advised on, as well as winning new clients and landmark transactions?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your firm adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of specific deals, client outreach, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How has your firm helped to further the development of the market?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Overview
The Service Provider of the Year category is open to advisory and analytics firms, intermediaries, trustees, rating agencies, STS verification agents etc.
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your firm’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year; for example, in terms of mandates won or technological/product advancements brought to market?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of specific deals, client outreach/support, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How has your firm helped to further the development of the market?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Overview
This category is open to all market constituents (buy-side, sell-side and service provider participants) who wish to nominate a team – whether internal/their own or external to their organisation – that has demonstrated exceptional service to the SRT industry during the awards qualifying period.
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and outline the team’s role in the market and its achievements, as well as include any data or testimonials that support the submission:
- In which ways does the team differentiate itself from its peers?
- What has been noteworthy about the team’s engagement with the market?
- Which strategic goals did the team set out to achieve and how have they been met?
- In which ways has the team adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- How has the team served or otherwise helped to further the development of the market?
Overview
In this category, market participants are welcome to nominate any individual or organisation that has tenure and has demonstrably helped to ‘move the needle’ for the SRT industry.
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise the nominee’s achievements in terms of market impact - whether that be through advocacy, regulatory or documentation developments, driving innovation etc.
- In which ways does the nominee stand apart from their peers?
- What has been noteworthy about their engagement with the market?
- In which ways has the nominee adapted to the evolution of the market?
- How has the nominee served or otherwise helped to further the development of the market?
Submit Your Pitch
Table Rates
Early bird
Standard
Register Your Place
Photo Gallery
