Why Enter SCI's 2025 Risk Sharing Awards?
The SCI Risk Sharing Awards cover the global capital relief trades market and the US credit risk transfer market. These annual awards recognise excellent work and outstanding contributions to our industry.
Each October, at our exclusive awards ceremony in London, over 200 influential experts gather to celebrate the very best achievements over the past year.
Deadline for Submissions
Shortlist Announced
Event Date
Location
The Pelligon - London
AWARDS PROCESS
Winners of the 2025 SCI Risk Sharing Awards will be chosen through a multi-step process.
The first step is a call for submissions. During this period, market participants are invited to put themselves, peers, or colleagues forward for an award. To aid in the selection process, brief written pitches, along with supporting data, can be submitted by those entering for an award.
All award submissions and entries should be submitted by the deadline on June 30.
Based on these entries, the SCI editorial team, alongside our trusted advisory board, will select a shortlist for each award category.
The award winners will be announced at our annual gala black-tie dinner, which is being held at The Pelligon, a stunning venue in Canary Wharf, London.
This year’s awards dinner will take place on October 14.
As a winner at the 2025 SCI Risk Sharing Awards, you could gain global recognition for your hard work, a prestigious award presented on-stage at our black-tie dinner, and coverage in our industry publication, read by thousands of your peers.
Best of luck!
Please note, the qualifying period for the 2025 awards is between July 1, 2024 and June 30, 2025.
Relive Our 2024 Industry Awards Ceremony Here
Advisory Board
Aidan Mckeown
Alastair Pickett
Andrea Itri
Charis Edwards
Jean-Francois Leclerc
Wasif Kazi
SHORTLIST
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and highlight the ways in which the transaction stands out from its peers, including any data or testimonials to support your submission:
- What are the noteworthy/innovative features of the deal?
- Which strategic goals have been met through the execution of the deal?
- In which ways has the deal enabled your institution to adapt to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- How has the deal facilitated your engagement with the market?
To maintain consistency in terms of award winners, please note the following guidance:
- For deal-specific categories, nominations will be accepted only for commercial parties to the transaction (advisors are welcome to pitch, but only their investor/issuer client will be eligible for an award)
- For public/syndicated deals, only the issuer and arranger will be eligible for an award
- For private/bilateral deals, only the issuer, the investor and the arranger will be eligible for awards.
Nominees
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and highlight the ways in which the transaction stands out from its peers, including any data or testimonials to support your submission:
- What are the noteworthy/innovative features of the deal?
- Which strategic goals have been met through the execution of the deal?
- In which ways has the deal enabled your institution to adapt to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- How has the deal facilitated your engagement with the market?
To maintain consistency in terms of award winners, please note the following guidance:
- For deal-specific categories, nominations will be accepted only for commercial parties to the transaction (advisors are welcome to pitch, but only their investor/issuer client will be eligible for an award)
- For public/syndicated deals, only the issuer and arranger will be eligible for an award
- For private/bilateral deals, only the issuer, the investor and the arranger will be eligible for awards.
Nominees
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and highlight the ways in which the transaction stands out from its peers, including any data or testimonials to support your submission:
- What are the noteworthy/innovative features of the deal?
- In which ways does the deal satisfy ESG considerations?
- Which strategic goals have been met through the execution of the deal?
- In which ways has the deal enabled your institution to adapt to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- How has the deal facilitated your engagement with the market and/or the market’s engagement with ESG considerations?
To maintain consistency in terms of award winners, please note the following guidance:
- For deal-specific categories, nominations will be accepted only for commercial parties to the transaction (advisors are welcome to pitch, but only their investor/issuer client will be eligible for an award)
- For public/syndicated deals, only the issuer and arranger will be eligible for an award
- For private/bilateral deals, only the issuer, the investor and the arranger will be eligible for awards.
Nominees
Overview
This category encompasses innovative deals/structures/documentation, as well as new products or platforms that further the development of the market.
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and highlight the ways in which the deal or product/platform being nominated differentiates itself, including any data or testimonials to support your submission:
- What are the noteworthy/innovative features of the deal or product/platform being nominated?
- How has it furthered the development of the market?
- Which strategic goals have been met through the deal or product/platform?
- In which ways has the deal or product/platform enabled your institution/end-users to adapt to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- How has the deal or product/platform facilitated engagement with the market?
To maintain consistency in terms of award winners, please note the following guidance:
- For deal-specific categories, nominations will be accepted only for commercial parties to the transaction (advisors are welcome to pitch, but only their investor/issuer client will be eligible for an award)
- For public/syndicated deals, only the issuer and arranger will be eligible for an award
- For private/bilateral deals, only the issuer, the investor and the arranger will be eligible for awards.
Nominees
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your firm’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or client testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of specific deals, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Nominees
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your firm’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of specific deals, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Nominees
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your institution’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year, in terms of issuance volumes and landmark transactions?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of investor outreach, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Nominees
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your institution’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year, in terms of issuance volumes and landmark transactions?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of investor outreach, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Nominees
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your institution’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year, in terms of issuance volumes, third-party mandates and landmark transactions?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of client outreach, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Nominees
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your institution’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year, in terms of issuance volumes, third-party mandates and landmark transactions?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of client outreach, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Nominees
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your firm’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year, in terms of volume of deals advised on, as well as winning new clients and landmark transactions?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your firm adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of specific deals, client outreach, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How has your firm helped to further the development of the market?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Nominees
Overview
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your firm’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year, in terms of volume of deals advised on, as well as winning new clients and landmark transactions?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your firm adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of specific deals, client outreach, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How has your firm helped to further the development of the market?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Nominees
Overview
The Service Provider of the Year category is open to advisory and analytics firms, intermediaries, trustees, rating agencies, STS verification agents etc.
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and summarise your firm’s achievements during the awards qualifying period, as well as include any data or testimonials that support your submission:
- How has your institution progressed over the course of the year; for example, in terms of mandates won or technological/product advancements brought to market?
- Which strategic goals have been met and how have they been achieved?
- In which ways has your institution adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- What has been noteworthy about your engagement with the market, whether in terms of specific deals, client outreach/support, geographical and/or sectoral diversification or innovation?
- How has your firm helped to further the development of the market?
- How do you differentiate yourself from your peers?
Nominees
Overview
This category is open to all market constituents (buy-side, sell-side and service provider participants) who wish to nominate a team – whether internal/their own or external to their organisation – that has demonstrated exceptional service to the SRT industry during the awards qualifying period.
Entry Criteria
Pitches should be limited to five pages and outline the team’s role in the market and its achievements, as well as include any data or testimonials that support the submission:
- In which ways does the team differentiate itself from its peers?
- What has been noteworthy about the team’s engagement with the market?
- Which strategic goals did the team set out to achieve and how have they been met?
- In which ways has the team adapted to the trends that have driven market activity during the year?
- How has the team served or otherwise helped to further the development of the market?
Nominees
Overview
In this category, market participants are welcome to nominate any individual or organisation that has tenure and has demonstrably helped to ‘move the needle’ for the SRT industry.
Entry Criteria
Winner to be revealed on the night!
Table Rates
Early bird
Standard
Attend Our Annual Awards DInner
Photo Gallery
Become a Part of World Risk Sharing Week 2025
SRT Training for New Market Entrants
Monday, October 13 and Tuesday, October 14.
Learn valuable new skills and knowledge from industry-leading experts.
European ABF Forum
Monday, October 13, 2025.
Take advantage of the growing demand for asset-backed finance.
New Issuers Forum
Tuesday, October 14, 2025.
Meet the investors who will help you move the needle.
World Risk Sharing Summit
Wednesday, October 15, 2025.
The industry's favourite annual event, bringing together over 400 of the world's leading influencers and brightest minds for a day of networking, innovation, and real deal opportunities.